Research papers and journal submission
Check references before journal submission, including AI-assisted citations, incorrect DOIs, and publication fields that disagree with the identified work.
AI CITATION CHECKER
Review references suggested by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or other AI tools. Compare titles, authors, publication details, and DOIs with scholarly metadata sources, then inspect the evidence before accepting a citation.
Evidence stays attached to the record.
The original input is preserved while provider matches, field evidence, and unresolved conflicts remain visible for review.
AI REFERENCE CHECK
Loading authentication…
Keep the citation as produced, including any DOI or URL, so its fields can be compared.
CiteWise submits the reference to supported scholarly metadata sources and evaluates candidate identity.
Inspect field-level evidence, conflicts, candidates, and source availability before deciding what to change.
RESEARCH WORKFLOWS
Use the same source-backed identity check for one suspicious citation or a complete bibliography. The workflow changes with the stakes and number of references, but the evidence remains reviewable.
Check references before journal submission, including AI-assisted citations, incorrect DOIs, and publication fields that disagree with the identified work.
Check whether a citation exists before adding it to an essay, thesis, or literature review. A matched identity still requires reading the source to assess whether it supports the claim.
Use an AI citation checker with sources to keep field-level provenance, candidate matches, and unresolved conflicts visible for higher-risk screening decisions.
To check a bibliography for fake references, use Reference Audit after sign-in. Batch AI citation checking, structured file imports, and audit exports require a Pro or Team / Lab plan.
Preserve the citation exactly as ChatGPT produced it, resolve any DOI, and compare the returned title, authors, journal, year, volume, issue, and pages with scholarly metadata sources. CiteWise acts as a ChatGPT citation checker by keeping provider evidence, conflicts, and candidate matches visible rather than treating a plausible citation as proof.
Treat them as leads, not verified sources. ChatGPT and other AI tools can invent a work, combine fields from different publications, or attach a real DOI to the wrong title. Verify the scholarly identity first, then read the original publication before relying on it for a claim.
Start with an exact DOI when one is present. If there is no DOI, compare the strongest available combination of title, authors, venue, year, volume, issue, and pages across relevant scholarly providers. A not-found result is inconclusive when metadata is incomplete or a source is unavailable.
Look for identity conflicts such as a DOI resolving to another work, a title that has no matching scholarly record, or publication fields assembled from different candidates. These signals require review; no single missing result proves that a reference was fabricated.
The Free workspace includes 10 provider-backed reference checks per month with no credit card required. This is a monthly allowance, not unlimited checking. Batch auditing, structured bibliography submission, and API access require a Pro or Team / Lab plan.
Yes. CiteWise resolves the DOI and compares its scholarly record with the rest of the citation. A valid DOI can still belong to a different title, author list, journal, or publication year, so identifier resolution and metadata comparison should be reviewed together.
CiteWise checks whether a reference identifies a scholarly work and highlights mismatches, candidates, and missing evidence. A not-found result does not prove fabrication, and an identity match does not show that a paper supports a manuscript claim.
Start with 10 provider-backed checks each month. No credit card required.
Create a free workspace